The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti - Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient. The anti - federalists demanded a bill of rights.
Both came together to hammer out the compromises needed in order to ratify the Constitution. The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti - Federalists viewed a weak national government as the best safeguard of the people's liberties. They believed in stronger state governments.
Additionally, what did the Federalists support? The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves " Federalists ." Their adopted name implied a commitment to a loose, decentralized system of government. In many respects "federalism" — which implies a strong central government — was the opposite of the proposed plan that they supported.
Federalists believed in a centralized national government with strong fiscal roots. In addition, the Federalists felt that the Constitution was open for interpretation.
The Three -Fifths Compromise appeased Southern representatives by allowing them to count slaves for representation and taxation purposes. The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti - Federalists wanted a weaker central government.
Below is a list of answers to questions that have a similarity, or relationship to, the answers on "What did federalist and anti federalist agree on?". This list is displayed so that you can easily and quickly access the available answers, without having to search first.
The Anti-Federalists were strong in the key states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. In North Carolina and Rhode Island they prevented ratification of the Constitution until after the new government had been established.
Federalists campaigned to support ratification because they believed the Constitution was the best way to balance these needs. Those opposed to the Constitution called themselves Democratic Republicans. The battle over the Constitution was fought, state by state.
In the ratification debate, the Anti-Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states.
The group that favored the new federal Constitution was called the “Federalists”. They argued that the separation of powers and checks and balances system created in the new Constitution protected the people. No one group could control the other two.
Federalists wanted a strong central government. They believed that a strong central government was necessary if the states were going to band together to form a nation. Federalists also believed that a strong central government could best protect individual citizens' rights and freedoms.
Published on November 22, 1787 under the name "Publius", Federalist No. 10 is among the most highly regarded of all American political writings. No. 10 addresses the question of how to reconcile citizens with interests contrary to the rights of others or inimical to the interests of the community as a whole.
The Bill of Rights: A History The first 10 amendments to the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights. James Madison wrote the amendments, which list specific prohibitions on governmental power, in response to calls from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties.
The Federalists favored Britain in the war and by far most of America's foreign trade was with Britain, hence a new treaty was called for. The republicans wanted to pressure Britain to the brink of war (and assumed that the United States could defeat a weak Britain).
The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.
Many Anti-Federalists preferred a weak central government because they equated a strong government with British tyranny. Others wanted to encourage democracy and feared a strong government that would be dominated by the wealthy. They felt that the states were giving up too much power to the new federal government.
The federalists favored the constitution and they wanted a strong national government that the constitution provided. The anti-federalists believed that the federalists pan posed a threat to state governments and to the rights of individuals. Why did the federalists win approval of the constitution?
The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay under the pseudonym "Publius" to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. The authors of The Federalist intended to influence the voters to ratify the Constitution.
The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression.
Why did Anti-Federalists favor a bill of rights? It would split power equally between the President and Congress. It would put goverment in the hands of individual states. It would give the government more power to make laws.
Free PDF Ebook
200 Hardest Brain Teasers Mind-Boggling Puzzles, Problems, and Curious Questions to Sharpen Your Brain
Disclaimer for Accuracy of Information: "This website assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site.
The information contained in this site is provided by our members and on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness."
|QnA by Community - Overall Statistic 2021|
|Number of Topics||750+|